Box Office Power Rankings: May 25-28, 2007

As expected, the third Pirates of the Caribbean movie dominated the Memorial Day box office, but $142 million was no match for the feisty limited-release Waitress in Culture Snob’s Box Office Power Rankings. Adrienne Shelly’s film used strong reviews and a blockbuster-worthy per-screen average to land atop this week’s ratings, even though it ranked fifth in overall box office.

Pirates of the Caribbean tied 28 Weeks Later for second place, with middling reviews sinking Jack Sparrow and company. To overtake Waitress, Pirates needed to score 67 at Rotten Tomatoes (instead of 47) and 63 at Metacritic (instead of 50).

Spider-Man 3 and Shrek the Third rounded out the top five.

Box Office Power Rankings: May 25-28
(Rank) Movie (last week; box office, per-screen, Rotten Tomatoes, Metacritic: total)
(1) Waitress (-; 6, 8, 10, 9: 33)
(2) 28 Weeks Later (1; 5, 3, 9, 10: 27)
(2) Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End (-; 10, 10, 4, 3: 27)
(4) Spider-Man 3 (2; 8, 7, 6, 5: 26)
(5) Shrek the Third (2; 9, 9, 3, 4: 25)
(6) Bug (-; 7, 5, 5, 7: 24)
(7) Fracture (4; 2, 4, 9, 8: 23)
(8) Disturbia (6; 4, 2, 7, 6: 19)
(9) Wild Hogs (-; 1, 6, 1, 2: 10)
(10) Georgia Rule (7; 3, 1, 2, 1: 7)

Methodology

Culture Snob’s Box Office Power Rankings balance box office and critical reception to create a better measure of a movie’s overall performance against its peers.

The weekly rankings cover the 10 top-grossing movies in the United States for the previous weekend. We assign equal weight to box office and critical opinion, with each having two components. The measures are: box-office gross, per-screen average, Rotten Tomatoes score, and Metacritic score.

Why those four? Box-office gross basically measures the number of people who saw a movie in a given weekend. Per-screen average corrects for blockbuster-wannabes that flood the market with prints, and gives limited-release movies a fighting chance. Rotten Tomatoes measures critical opinion in a binary way. And Metacritic gives a better sense of critics’ enthusiasm (or bile) for a movie.

For each of the four measures, the movies are ranked and assigned points (10 for the best performer, one for the worst). Finally, those points are added up, with a maximum score of 40 and a minimum score of four.

Leave a comment

I'm a LAMB

  • bt_assoc_grey.jpg

Recent Entries

  • Box Office Power Rankings: November 14-16, 2008

    Does it make sense to get out of the way of a certain blockbuster? Or should studios try to tap into a market being unserved ...

  • Fixed Favorites

    For the first time since fall 2006, I updated the 100 Favorite Movies feature of Culture Snob. Thirteen movies were added, and 29 went away. ...

  • Box Office Power Rankings: November 7-9, 2008

    It was odd to read these two things within a few minutes of each other: On Role Models: “[T]he kind of movie you don’t see ...

  • Box Office Power Rankings: October 31-November 2, 2008

    The consensus that Kevin Smith’s Zack and Miri Make a Porno and Clint Eastwood’s Changeling were poor performers — the weakest Halloween weekend in a ...

  • Thomson Twinge

    “Have You Seen ... ?” David Thomson’s “Have You Seen ... ?” A Personal Introduction to 1,000 Films is the book that I’d been waiting ...

Most-Read Entries

Recent Comments

  • I don’t disagree, but I think there can still be subtlety in a character with a hard surface. The performance might indeed be honest, but ...

  • I think the reason Taylor Hackford directed Jennifer Jason Leigh to deliver through clenched teeth is that her character, after years of abuse, no longer ...

  • Kudos on your inclusion of “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre.” This film always seems to be criticized more and more as it ages. However, its ...

  • TRANSIT is one of best shorts I ever seen. Piet Kroon and Ian Harvey are together in a new movie: “Not the End of the ...

  • Two reasons I revere Martin Scorsese are: The tempo of his films and his compassion for characters on the fringe. His love of film ...

    Mike Reid
    My Movie Life
Close